Perplexity 推出了一个名为 Perplexity Max 的新等级，每月费用为 200 美元：rperplexity_ai_ai --知识铺

这是最差的级别之一。就连 Gemini Ultra 也比它好。好在至少他们没有从 Pro 用户那里拿走任何东西。 👉 点击这里领取福利： 我的Comet专属邀请链接 🔗

好消息是，至少他们没有从专业用户那里拿走任何东西

这可以解释为什么 Perplexity 的响应质量/长度在过去几个月中一直在不断变差……让现有的体验变得更糟，以使新的/更昂贵的定价层看起来更有吸引力。

即便如此，这绝对是 200 美元 AI 订阅中最差的，而且远超其他订阅。尤其是考虑到即使是 Gemini Pro 的基础深度研究报告长度也比 Perplexity 长 3-5 倍。

老实说，我很确定 Claude Max 是唯一值得花钱的 200 美元计划，如果与 Claude Code 对昂贵的 AI 模型进行编码的极其慷慨的速率限制相结合，否则通过标准令牌 API 定价将花费 5,000-10,000 美元。

是的，但它很困惑。

到八月份我们将获得 90% 的折扣。

更多回复 更多回复

有趣的是：有时公司会推出 200 美元的套餐，让 20 美元的套餐看起来更划算。而且这招很有效！499 美元的 Tinder Select 显著提升了 9.99 美元 Tinder Plus 的注册人数

双子座超极本怎么会比这个好？考虑到 Deep Think 还没发布，而且他们好像还随机放了一堆产品的测试版。这可能是因为我最近在他们年度 I/O 大会上浪费了 200 美元，感觉有点失望，哈哈。

明确地说，我认为所有 200 美元/月的计划都很糟糕

更多回复

我喜欢 Perplexity Pro，实验室非常酷，他们推出更多选项真是太好了，如果有人问“如果我只能获得一个 AI 订阅，我应该获得哪一个？”，我会首先推荐 Perplexity。

但这个 200 美元的等级可能是我见过的最差的等级。

我很高兴 Pro 级别仍然具有令人难以置信的价值，所以我仍然推荐 Perplexity Pro，但是真是的。

您在专业版订阅中使用了哪些功能？我喜欢专业搜索，也喜欢用 Claude Thinking 来寻找更深入的答案，但还没用过实验室。

好奇如何从潜艇中获得更多价值的想法。

更多回复

我认为没有必要为此多付 900% 甚至 10 倍的费用，而且为了什么？无限制访问实验室和 Opus Thinking？（专业级已经可以访问 Sonnet Thinking v4 了）。

我想说 50 美元/月更符合所提供的额外服务。

是的，价格差太多了，pplx 的一些高管在吸毒，以为他们可以和其他平台的顶级产品收费一样

等到 Pro 停滞不前（或在幕后变得更糟）时，所有新的东西都只会添加到 Max 中

那我就换 Gemini 了。它的深度研究远超 Perplexity，而且这还是 Gemini 免费版！

更多回复

Where did you get that? I said that I don’t think there is enough added value to charge $200 and that $50 would be more like it.

Never did I suggest anything else.

What he said is what they’re most likely going to do lol

Google did that to their Pro plan. They drastically reduced usage limits and gave it to the $200 plan

更多回复 更多回复

有了这个新订阅，如果上下文内存仍然保持在 32k，那么它就没用了

恭喜，你刚刚解释了为什么人们离开 Perplexity 转而使用 Gemini，哈哈。2.5 Pro 拥有 1M 上下文窗口，其深度研究报告是 Perplexity 的 3-5 倍。

It’s wild how Perplexity fumbled their lead over Deep Research so incredibly bad to the point competitors have not just caught up, but left them in the dust

Probably hemorrhaging money. They have to pay for the searches and the api calls on top of everything else. 

I left for a while and came back to check it out and it’s absolutely not worth $20.  $200 is nuts for what they have. 

Imo Anthropic is the only provider giving $200 of value. Gemini should max at $100, same with ChatGPT now that they retired o1.  

Not worth $20? What are you maining right now?

更多回复

I’m still preferring Perplexity, am I alone? It’s so concise and straight to the point

Gemini deep research is everytime a god damn 10 pages essay

Oh, it’s definitely good for short and quick answers. But at that point every other AI model offers quick internet search backed short responses as long as you don’t turn off deep research.

It’s funny because I still use perplexity, but before I used to treat is a my powerful research assistant, whereas now it’s my stupid quick search assistant for anything less important.

更多回复

10 pages is if you are lucky! ran a gemini deep research for a coworker today and got a 28 page manifesto lol

Nah, same here. I’ve got the subscription of both, and Perplexity is wayy better than Gemini in extracting relevant data with citations.

Do you guys know what Deep Research means?

Gemini clears

Thanks for defining an otherwise very complex word

更多回复 更多回复

Also prefer Perplexity’s to both ChatGPT and Gemini. Sure, both of those are longer than Perplexity, but I don’t want to read an essay 95% of the time. (And when I do I go to my ChatGPT sub.)

That’s Gemini Deep Research’s only disadvantage. But they can provide a podcast! Isn’t that awesome?

Oh that’s neat, I didn’t know this

更多回复 更多回复

It depends, gemini sometimes does not give the most update information even with the deep research. I would use both, + chatgpt deep search. The worst for me is grok deeper search

That’s fixable by setting information time range in report criteria. I rarely put faith in AI models being smart enough to set their own date limits

I like Perplexity’s Deep Research for non-academic research. Like I want to search up on an organization, a person, or a simple topic that I can get a lot of information on quickly.

Gemini’s Deep Research is a little too academic for my taste. Excellent, but a little skewed to the ‘report’ style of presentation. Grok’s is pretty good however. Haven’t tried GPT.

更多回复

why is grok deeper search worse for you? too much reliance on twitter and recent data compared to the other ai models?

更多回复

I don’t want reports to be 5x longer lol. I like the shorter ones!

更多回复 更多回复

Yeah, commented on a previous thread the other day about this tier. The only thing that would really make it worthwhile would either be full model context access, or at the very least an extremely expanded context size. That would make it pretty compelling to have all of the big models in one place. Would be even better if they allowed temperature controls. As it is I can’t imagine it being worthwhile with such a small context size.

32k doesn’t sound too bad, if…

I mean, this is how I would do it:

squeeze Pro subscribers down to 2k context length

Lol what? That’s less than ChatGPT was at launch for free (GPT-3.5 was 16k context). They’d lose pretty much all of their paying Pro subs. If that’s how you’d do it, you’d ruin the company lol.

I mean, they are already bleeding subscribers. There is a HUGE percentage of people who are subscribed via one of those 95% off yearly discount coupon codes rampantly available, or that have cancelled and resubscribed with one of them because of how poor value Perplexity has become compared to every other AI model and their Deep Research that caught up

Okay. And would a reduction to 2k context length make you want to sub to either pro or max (with max at 32k)? I said “paying” Pro subs deliberately, because I recognize that they’ve given out free/reduced Pro subs like candy. All they’d do is drive away people who were actually paying for Pro. Maybe the company already isn’t doing well, but they’d be doing even worse after a change like that lol.

更多回复

Let me run the company and I’ll show you. We’ll see how this will work out at the end of the year.

更多回复 更多回复 更多回复

$200 is the new $9.99 Don’t like labs, its quite dumb

lol, I’m genuinely curious who gonna spend that money

If the free version doesn’t meet my expectations, neither the pro nor max version will.

The sooner this bubble pops, the better.

Ai enshittification when its embedded into everything and Ai cyborg overlords are cucking you is gonna be funny

Who’s gonna buy that honestly

$200, thats enough money to get into saving for local hardware to run your own labs. Save the money, buy the hardware, then spend the $200 on electricity.

When you get to those kinds of numbers, you can’t tell me i can’t beat the value by switching to local and running any and ALL AI driven applications locally…

They don’t even provide their own models, what 200$ for?

I’m a heavy Pro user though, but this new subs is nonsense

This actually makes sense, although I do wish they gave a few (or even just one) o3 / Claude 4 Sonnet Thinking deep researches a day for pro users.

How about they add pages to iOS first.

$200/month is roughly 3% of monthly income after tax for a 100k income.

So I would have to justify whether it brings 3% efficiency every month for using perplexity.

While I think Perplexity is really really good at helping me, Perplexity only takes up a small portion of my my entire development flow or SDLC. Until I find a use case bigger than that, it’s hard to justify the price tag, unless my company pays for them.

Perplexity worked for me for a little while. Then some horrible change happened and it’s been just kind of meh. So it’s $200 to get it fixed. Just forget it perplexity.

Perplexity is worth $5 for a one year for context cutting and making things worse

This doesnt seem to offer much of anything. Also it’s a horrible move to offer “early access” in a subscription tear. It basically means nothing. Why are they doing this with talks of Apple buying them?

I wonder how they came up with this pricing model, so innovative…

Claude 200$ -> Gemini 169$ -> now perplexity 200$🤦🏽♂️ American AI model providers that are locked, be really squeezing money out of its users. I know Perplexity pro is by far the best value existing on the market right now and please for the love of God stop paying these overhyped subscriptions beyond 50$+ Ask urself: What real value proposition i’m receiving for the amount i pay. Most of the time u will notice u ain’t getting a lot for what u pay for. 🤫

All these companies do is copy one another

I love Perplexity Pro, but $200 is heresy!

I am in the industry but still have no idea what perplexity does over its competition. Also it says access other services. ok, how?seriously, what button do I click to do that? How do I know when it’s working? and why would I try? I have the pro version on some coupon thing. zero intent to pay for it

New? Been that way for a while

For 200 a month hope I will have to just think what I need to do, rest should be done by Perplexity.

I can’t really justify shelling out this kind of money even though I’d get access to more. It’s just not worth it at this time.

I rather pay for chatgpt,Gemini isn’t even Good,only for simple things and it even screws that up

Alright I was already tired of these $200 “max” subs when Claude did it but come onnnnnn when will this just die

terms like “AI safety”, “ethical alignment”, or “RLHF for values” are being co-opted to justify high pricing, throttling access, and locking down APIs. The bubble will burst soon and i know Claude AI is full of ganged bots hyping the 200$ plan.

更多回复

That’s why Perplexity’s response quality is going down? I am considering turning to Gemini Advanced. I can still enjoy Gemini 2.5 pro and deep research with gemini 2.5 pro right? Not like perplexity?

Não, nuito caro. Perplexity decepcionou com esse lançamento.

Somebody tryna send me a comet invite😮💨